Talk:Typhoon Nanmadol (2022)

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

On 19 November 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Damage Totals[edit]

What is Nanmadol’s damage total right now? TheEasternEditer (talk) 01:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The damage so far says 1.2 billion dollars. Layah50♪ (喋ってください!) 01:42, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 November 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 10:22, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Nanmadol (2022) → ? –i want to remove the (2022) tag since typhoon nanmadol is the strongest 🌀 SuperTyphoonNoru 🌀 SuperTyphoonNoru (talk) 08:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose Certainly, 2022 Typhoon Nanmadol was a very strong. However, The damage was minor than Typhoons have same name in other years. 2004 Typhoon Nanmadol killed 77 people, 2011 Typhoon Nanmadol killed 38 people. But 2022 Typhoon Nanmadol only killed 5 people ([1]). 126.152.38.161 (talk) 13:33, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: per the IP address Cyclonetracker7586 (talk) 01:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Nanmadol 2022 does not merit a place of primacy over the 2004, 2011 and 2017 typhoons of the same name, comparable in terms of intensity and destructiveness, but doesn't rise above the rest. Drdpw (talk) 18:27, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Nanmadol was strong, but incomparable to the storms with the same name. Hurricane Su (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Nanmadol from this year may have been costly, because it caused similar damage that Hinnamnor caused, but just like Drdpw, other storms named Nanmadol, especially 2011's, easily dominate this year's Nanmadol. GDFilbert03 (talk) 17:49, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Typhoon Nanmadol" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Typhoon Nanmadol and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 20#Typhoon Nanmadol until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 🌀 SuperTyphoonNoru 🌀 SuperTyphoonNoru (talk) 05:38, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]