Talk:U.S. Route 10 in Michigan/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 01:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • M-10 is linked twice in the lead.
      • Which is intentional because the second is for the Lodge Freeway. That's acceptable. Imzadi 1979 →
    • The sentence "For westbound US 10 traffic wishing to connect to southbound US 127 or northbound US 127 traffic that desires to continue on eastbound US 10, those connections are made using the business routes through downtown." needs to be reworded.
      • There's nothing wrong with that from a grammatical or semantical standpoint. I tweaked it though. Imzadi 1979 →
    • "Two miles (3.2 km) further east, US 10 turns to the southeast, bordered by residential subdivisions of the city of Midland to its south and vacant fields to its north"? How do you know the fields are vacant? I would suggest removing the word.
      • The satellite imagery backs the emptiness of the fields there. Imzadi 1979 →
    • The sentence "The former routing through the city is redesigned M-10." sounds awkward.
      • You mean you changed the other sentences with similar past tense structures that I might have missed in the revisions, and you didn't change that from "is" to "was"? Imzadi 1979 →
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • "The first state trunkline highways designated along the path of the modern US 10 were M-20, M-24 and M-10 as far back as 1919", but this is the routing all the way to Detroit as mentioned further along. The part east of Midland is not modern US 10, so this provides a contradiction.
    • Can more details about the construction of the Lodge Freeway be added?
      • Sure, in the M-10 (Michigan highway) article. The Lodge was not US 10 when it opened. In fact, it didn't have a number when it was opened in 1957. It was later given the BS I-696 numbering. US 10 was on Woodward Avenue for a dozen years or so after the Lodge was built. This is irrelevant detail to US 10. Imzadi 1979 → 04:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for some fixes to be made. Dough4872 01:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied above. Imzadi 1979 → 04:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I will now pass the article. Dough4872 15:31, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:U.S._Route_10_in_Michigan/GA1&oldid=1137276313"