Talk:U.S. Route 6 in Iowa/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 04:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

ELs and DABs look good.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Looks good after a few tweaks.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Good here.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Good here.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Good here.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Good here.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   No photos (which is a shame, but not a requirement), but I note that the map should have its GIS source(s) indicated by the creator. The map should have a caption added.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Final verdict is a pass. The minor issue over the map won't withhold passage. Imzadi 1979 → 02:37, 10 September 2013 (UTC)