Talk:UBlock Origin/Archives/2017
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Is this better at evading detection?
I need a better ad-blocker that isn't detected by sites, which is why I want this. Here's a couple sites for example, that can detect adblock, can this evade it (and block the ads) The snare (talk) 02:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
1.http://www.kiplinger.com/slideshow/business/T057-S001-7-things-that-will-soon-disappear/index.html\ 2.http://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=http://www.forbes.com/&refURL=https://www.google.com/&referrer=https://www.google.com/
It's not supposed to be, it's for discussion- to see if anyone knows and can add it to the article, how it compares to other blockers.The snare (talk) 13:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Needs mention of third-party filters to allow firewall access to
e.g., malwaredomains.com
malwaredomains.com and similar deserve an article on Wikipedia, if they don't have one already. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocdcntx (talk • contribs)
Move version history to own page
How about creating own page for the version history? That long version history table just adds clutter to the article. Just leave couple of notable changes to the article, and move rest to own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.23.112.148 (talk) 12:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not sure we need it at all, see WP:NOTCHANGELOG. - Ahunt (talk) 15:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)