Talk:UK Adult Film and Television Awards

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Pornography High‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Awards / British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Awards

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on UK Adult Film and Television Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080927185837/http://www.ukafta.com:80/award.php?id=2 to http://www.ukafta.com/award.php?id=2
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080425044923/http://www.ukafta.com:80/? to http://www.ukafta.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on UK Adult Film and Television Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080212030942/http://www.channel4.com:80/news/articles/arts_entertainment/piper+drama+up+for+adult+film+award/1071447 to http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/arts_entertainment/piper+drama+up+for+adult+film+award/1071447

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Current awards[edit]

The awards actually still exist as I could now find out. They are called UKAP awards, organized by UK Adult Producers: As of 2016 they say "It's the UKAP Awards 10th year" And here they say that the UKAFT Awards were their first awards in 2006. Back then UKAP didn't fully admit these awards, but the organizers were members from UKAP acting against the majority from UKAP. Nowadays they clearly state "look back on UKAP Awards when we started out as UKAFTA". So, the page should be moved to "UKAP Awards". --SamWinchester000 (talk) 09:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In their Award History they state that again in 2017: "The UKAP Awards was previously known as UKAFTA and 2017 will be our 12th year". --SamWinchester000 (talk) 00:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit[edit]

I trimmed the article leaving the material that can reliably cited to secondary sources, rather than the award itself diff. Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, there's nothing wrong with using the awarding organization (the organization that gave the awards out in the first place) as a reliable source for who won which awards. Who better would know who won which award than the award organization itself? One's opinion on whether or not the awards in question are "significant" is meaningless. I'll be likely reverting momentarily. Guy1890 (talk) 00:02, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I'd also like to know where you think that you're getting the authority to remove what (in apparently your own opinion) is "Intricate detail" from this and many, many other Wikipedia articles as well as established & reliable citations and/or sourced material. Please stop doing this. Guy1890 (talk) 00:10, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Guy1890: This award, per recent AfDs, is not considered "well known and significant". Thus, including everyone who won this non-notable award falls under WP:INDISCRIMINATE, with the article itself becoming a WP:DIRECTORY of said non notable performers. We don't include winners of every local Spelling Bee competitions in the encyclopedia, do we? K.e.coffman (talk) 01:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, your personal opinion of this award ceremony is meaningless, and it isn't "non-notable", since "well known and significant" is a higher standard than whether something is notable or not. Your recent attempts to gut more than three-quarters of this article's reliably-sourced content aren't going anywhere. Please stop your attempts at disruptive editing. Guy1890 (talk) 05:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]