Talk:USS Massachusetts (BB-2)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 20:24, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Conversion needed for the displacement figure in the infobox (and specify what type of ton is being used)

    Done Yoenit (talk) 11:11, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   What makes museuminthesea.com reliable?

   It's the official site of the Florida Underwater Archaeological Preserves and run by the Florida State government. Yoenit (talk) 11:11, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

   Odd that it's not .gov then. Parsecboy (talk) 11:22, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   File:Massachusetts.jpg needs a proper source showing date of publication or death-date of the author to prove that it's PD in the US.

   I have mailed the webmaster of Maritime quest with a request for more information, will post again once I know more Yoenit (talk) 11:11, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

   As I have received no response yet I decided to use another picture for the infobox, a color painting. Yoenit (talk) 21:24, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Excellent work so far, there are just a few issues that need to be addressed before the article meets the GA criteria. Parsecboy (talk) 20:24, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

   Alright then, everything looks fine now. Parsecboy (talk) 13:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)