Talk:USS Turner Joy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS Turner Joy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Vietnam

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Other interesting facts to be included?[edit]

In January 1973, TJ was involved in several "Operation Linebacker" strikes on North Vietnam, including one dubbed "The Battle of Brandon Bay", reported to be the largest naval engagement since WWII.

TJ fired the last naval salvo in support of the ARVN, one minute prior to the ceasefire.

206.176.227.44 (talk) 23:58, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Tim Campion[reply]

Tim, I edited the artitcle to include the 10k rounds fired, and last round fired. I used the 72-73 Wespac Cruise book as ref. I am sure the National Archives have our log entries. Regards Dave Ginsburg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stream-enterer (talk • contribs) 15:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chapter about Gulf of Tonkin Incident, The truth was very different[edit]

Read 30-year Anniversary: Tonkin Gulf Lie Launched Vietnam War
View Gulf of Tonkin - "War Made Easy"

The Pentagon Papers also revealed the text of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was drafted and ready months before the actual fabricated incident took place. Johannjs (talk) 00:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 20, 1982 Attack on the USS Turner Joy[edit]

According to the 1982 CINCPAC Command History (p 386-387), the USS Turner Joy was attacked with small arms fire from a Vietnamese vessel on the evening of June 20, 1982. The vessel was struck in the hull and superstructure, causing only superficial damage. The USS Lynde McCormick and USS Sterett were also fired upon hours later in the morning of June 21. --D.E. Watters (talk) 01:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possible COPYVIO detected: emphasis rather that "quotation" of technical term[edit]

Wotcher, the standard for describing technical terms in non-technical texts is to "quote" them. I detected and edited an emphasis on gunline as a technical term of naval deployment to quotation ("gunline"). That we had gunline indicates that someone may have pasted gunline from a source without editing ``text\'\' properly. This indicates a copyvio by pasting may have occurred as the editor did not paraphrase their source. I'm noting this as I don't have the time to conduct the research (or obviously log in), as I'm mobile and not actively editing. If someone could check against source to see if the technical term indicates a paste, rather than out of style presentation of a technical term. Also, possibly, a more naval oriented editor could consider whether we have an article on gunlines and wikilink for the interested reader fascinated by the technical term. 120.18.212.18 (talk) 07:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been introduced here [[1]] by an IP editor as a style issue. The prior read shore bombardment duty. I'm suspicious that both the emphasis and language expressive style "gunline" is less clear than "shore bombardment duty." I lack adequate expertise in the presentation of naval technical issues to the general reading public to observe the superiority of one over the other, but would observe that we don't have a gunline topic, and it is obtuse compared to shore bombardment duty. 120.18.212.18 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 07:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]