Talk:US Mexico Trade Dispute - Stainless Steel Sheets and Coils dumping

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the US Mexico Trade Dispute - Stainless Steel Sheets and Coils dumping article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments[edit]

The article is well written, includes specific articles in violation and provides a lot of important information about the dispute. Sections provide good overview of the dispute and introductory paragraph includes all major information. The last several references seem to be in the wrong format and are not numbered. But as a whole, article is very interesting and easy to read.

Editor[edit]

This article flows very well and makes reading easy to understand yet It is very specific. In the section The Complaint, you have two sets of bullet points. Also there seems to be some kind of error with your references as they are citied properly, and then listed again as bullets, it seems you have doubled the citations in your references section. Wikipedia does this itself once you have added references throughout your article. KateCollins10 (talk) 01:26, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editor[edit]

Well written, very neutral. Good job! 1993MJ (talk) 02:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editor[edit]

The article itself is very well written and the information added by the author makes it even better. I personally enjoyed reading it because the language is not very technical and it is easy to read. Well done. Rodricastiglioni (talk) 01:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]