Talk:Undead Labs

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (5 participants)
Stick Soldiers (0 participants)
Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake (6 participants)
Matt Alt (1 participant)
Granny (video game series) (2 participants)
Sago Sago (3 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (2 participants)
Kelly Metzger (9 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (13 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Prod vs Redirect[edit]

I noticed the prod from User:Chuunen Baka is based on WP:CRYSTAL. Admittedly the company has not yet produced a product, but it has received some media coverage for its launch. So it may be somewhat notable without triggering WP:CRYSTAL. However, the coverage seems to have occurred primarily because of interest in the founder, Jeff Strain. So I wonder if a redirect to Jeff Strain may be more appropriate than deletion. --RL0919 (talk) 23:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. --Chuunen Baka (talk) 09:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --RL0919 (talk) 15:28, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Artists that worked on Guild Wars?[edit]

They couldn't have been very important artists then because if you check out the staff roll of artists between Guild Wars 1 and Guild Wars 2 they remain unchanged (in fact, the roster of artists has simply grown rather than changed).

So I don't buy that statement at all and I'd love to see the article writer's citation for it, otherwise I think we should just remove it because I honestly don't think it's grounded in reality or fact, but rather the wishful thinking of the article writer.77.107.172.208 (talk) 01:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]