Talk:Underscore.js

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maintenance and rating of JavaScript articles[edit]

Concerning editing and maintaining JavaScript-related articles...

Collaboration...[edit]

If you are interested in collaborating on JavaScript articles or would like to see where you could help, stop by Wikipedia:WikiProject JavaScript and feel free to add your name to the participants list. Both editors and programmers are welcome.

Where to list JavaScript articles[edit]

We've found over 300 JavaScript-related articles so far. If you come across any others, please add them to that list.

User scripts[edit]

The WikiProject is also taking on the organization of the Wikipedia community's user script support pages. If you are interested in helping to organize information on the user scripts (or are curious about what we are up to), let us know!

If you have need for a user script that does not yet exist, or you have a cool idea for a user script or gadget, you can post it at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests. And if you are a JavaScript programmer, that's a great place to find tasks if you are bored.

How to report JavaScript articles in need of attention[edit]

If you come across a JavaScript article desperately in need of editor attention, and it's beyond your ability to handle, you can add it to our list of JavaScript-related articles that need attention.

Rating JavaScript articles[edit]

At the top of the talk page of most every JavaScript-related article is a WikiProject JavaScript template where you can record the quality class and importance of the article. Doing so will help the community track the stage of completion and watch the highest priority articles more closely.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 01:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Overview and examples of functions section[edit]

Wikipedia is not a how-to guide, and I think the "Overview and examples of functions" section should be removed. --ZimZalaBim talk 18:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The 2nd to last paragraph of the history section reads like an endorsement[edit]

The paragraph goes to great lengths to justify the existence of these libraries in a modern Javascript ecosystem. It should be rewritten or removed. Mashkal3000 (talk) 00:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Mashkal3000. Thanks for posting this. I went ahead and trimmed the paragraph a bit to fix its tone. My changes are here. Thanks. –Novem Linguae (talk) 01:38, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]