Talk:Uniform
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
=hello spy ninjas it is i pz9 the best fighter and i just hacked wikipedia go check out my channel for more in formation melvin pz9 the best fighter and time for me to hack youtube now peace′
Russian Federation[edit]
It strikes me as both unnecessary and very odd that the "Example" section contains a sub-section, "Russian Federation" containing exclusively pictures of Russian women in uniform. This section seems entirely dispensable. CharlesMartel (talk) 20:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)CharlesMartel
Not much actual information about uniforms?[edit]
It's mostly just a bunch of examples/types. Shouldn't an encyclopedic article have some form of history section? Where did uniforms start? What was the first (recognised) uniform? Was it's use mandated, chosen due to practical considerations, just happened to evolve, etc? Have (some) uniforms always had decorative aspects, or did it become fashionable at some point? Did uniform originally mean clothing and other meanings came from it, or other way around? Shouldn't there be some grouping of different classes of uniform? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.29.164.155 (talk) 17:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Should include more PICTURES, and more information generally[edit]
More pictures of uniforms would be good because uniforms are a, amongst other things, a visual medium.
And more discussion of sports uniforms, work uniforms. More emphasis on civilian uniforms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TwoMetalDragons (talk • contribs) 04:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)