Talk:United Issarak Front

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United Issarak Front article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cambodia Mid‑importance

United Issarak Front is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

A fact from United Issarak Front appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 November 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the United Issarak Front leader Son Ngoc Minh declared Cambodian independence on June 19 1950?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/November.

Wikipedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United Issarak Front. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080906220413/http://www.uq.edu.au/access_history/two-two/khmer.pdf to http://www.uq.edu.au/access_history/two-two/khmer.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About the Khmer script[edit]

Though someone remove the Khmer script from this article with different ridiculous reasons again and again (see its edit history: [1][2][3]), the Khmer script should be in this article. Khmer script should not add on English Wikipedia? It is unnecessary to add it to the infobox? The logic is equal to we should not add English text "Donald Trump" in Arabic Wikipedia article "دونالد ترامب", only its "English Arabization" is needed. So he is chopping logic, it's absolutely ridiculous.

The Khmer script is "សមាគមខ្មែរឥស្សរៈ" (source: [4][5]); "សមាគម" means society or association, "ខ្មែរ" means Khmer, "ឥស្សរៈ" means Issarak. It takes me a lot of time to find it. Few people can read Khmer script here; if someday the Khmer script is removed, and its script is hard to find, it will be a loss to Wikipedia. So, I decide to achieve it here.--112.49.100.178 (talk) 03:50, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The khmer script may be added to the main body of text, but it is not needed in the infobox, also dont remove the latin-script version of the khmer name as it is useful to people who dont understand khmer script! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:53, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Khmer language is written in Khmer script; the native script is Khmer script; so I think, "native name" in the infobox SHOULD use Khmer script. And, I had NEVER remove Khmer Romanization; it is in the main text, following the Khmer script. Why you say I have "removed the latin-script"? It makes me very confused. That's why I think you're "chopping logic" before. We are both badtempered, both of us should be calm. I don't want edit war. Again, I strongly suggest that Khmer script SHOULD be remained in this article.--112.5.241.111 (talk) 04:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]