Talk:United States Intercollegiate Lacrosse Association

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lacrosse Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lacrosse, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of lacrosse on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LacrosseWikipedia:WikiProject LacrosseTemplate:WikiProject Lacrosselacrosse articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrepancies, 1914–1929[edit]

The following 14 teams are listed in Section 2.1 as being among the national co-champions for the years shown. However, they are not included in the list of annual champions at the Hickok Sports History website (http://web.archive.org/web/20130426044557/http:/www.hickoksports.com/history/ncamlacr.shtml).

1914 Lehigh, Cornell

1916 Cornell

1918 Johns Hopkins

1919 Johns Hopkins

1920 Syracuse

1922 Johns Hopkins

1923 Johns Hopkins

1924 Johns Hopkins

1925 Syracuse

1928 Maryland, Navy, Rutgers

1929 Navy

Johns Hopkins includes the 5 co-championships from 1918–1919 and 1922–1924 among its claimed national championships. During those five seasons, Hickok Sports lists only the 3 championships for Navy, 2 for Syracuse and 1 for Army (with Navy and Syracuse sharing the 1922 title). Why does this difference exist?

Jeff in CA (talk) 01:42, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It turns out that Hickok is not authoritative. Don't trust it, at least for lacrosse. Its list includes significant errors. The USILA itself even published these errors on its own website, with a citation of Wikipedia! The Hickok website can no longer be accessed, as its domain URL has been abandoned and has been so for a long time apparently. Hickok must have obtained its list from somewhere else rather than doing the research. I believe the table shown at the web archive site linked above and at other sites around the internet are, in fact, exact copies of each other, having been propagated without knowing the precise source. This is so because reliable sources exist in the form of books written by legendary coaches of the best college teams and the claims of championships that the various colleges themselves recognize, and these reliably sourced claims are in many instances different from the Hickok list and its copycats.

Jeff in CA (talk) 23:16, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]