Talk:United States Senate Committee on the District of Columbia

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Lack of accuracy and citations[edit]

This page has no references to external lists. Also, several of the early chairmen are listed as "Republicans", from a time before the modern Republican Party existed. Those chairmen would probably have been (though there are no citations here) members of the group now known as the Democratic-Republican Party, whose members generally called themselves "Republicans", but which was defunct by the 1820's.

Arun (talk) 04:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This wasn't really very hard to check out. The Senate's website has a list of all chairmen of all standing committees ever, and this list is obviously derived from that. john k (talk) 01:38, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ETA - obviously also written by me, 8 years ago, it would appear. At any rate, it was obvious that "republican" meant "Democratic-Republican," and you could have changed the links yourself instead of adding a disputed tag when this article was perfectly factual, and could easily be checked against reliable sources. Certainly I should have included the reference when I created the article, but a "disputed" tag should really only go up when somebody has reason to actually think the article is substantially factually incorrect, but doesn't know how to correct it. john k (talk) 01:40, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]