Talk:United States v. Stewart (2003)

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Recent edit[edit]

Wodan added the following to the Article: "[Congress can criminalize possession of homemade machine guns]...under the commerce clause even though none of their components were ever, or will ever will be [sic] transferred, sold, or involved in any sort of commerce transaction."

The problem here is the "will ever be." This is something we can't know; to prove that Stewart never would have transferred or sold the guns, had he not been arrested and his guns seized, is an impossible counterfactual. It should therefore be left out. The sentence also needs to be revised so that its errors of grammar and usage can be eliminated. Finally, the sentence's tone has a pretty POV flavor ("were ever, or will ever" and "any sort of" sound like as if they come from a brief, not an encylopedia article). I'm going to make changes to correct these problems. Hydriotaphia 18:25, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One last thing. The phrase about their "components" just isn't true. Stewart purchased the components—the building blocks—of the machineguns, after all. It's the guns themselves that weren't involved in commerce. Hydriotaphia 18:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Supreme Court case?[edit]

Because this case was never argued or heard by the Supreme Court, I feel it doesn't belong in Category:United States Supreme Court cases, and further doesn't deserve to be listed on the List of SCOTUS cases. Would anyone object to de-categorying it and removing it from the list? --MZMcBride 19:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cases with the same name[edit]

Stewart v. United States was a case in 1855, therefore the link does not work suitably. See: volume #58.

Accommodations for both cases must be provided! Superslum 01:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another link to Stewart v. United States is in volume #60, oddly. It also points to the 21st-century decision. Superslum 01:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the two older cases with this name listed above, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 316 claims there's a case from 1942 with this same name that DID reach the Supreme Court. 68.39.174.238 02:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this kind of thing happens commonly. It's not a problem unless someone wants to create an article for the other cases. Inevitably, recentism means this is slow to happen. If you do want to create an article for another case, move this article to "United States v. Stewart (2005)" and create a disambiguation page at the former location for links to the two or three different articles. Until those articles are created, it's not necessary to disambiguate.--Chaser - T 04:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]