This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
The excessive listing of all application areas without independent sources violates WP:SPS, WP:MANUAL and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Generally speaking, an article should only provide an encyclopedic overview of the most relevant and noteworthy facts for a topic, not a complete product manual or leaflet. Self-published sources can be used occasionally and with some caution, but the bulk of the content should be based on independent reliable sources. Of course significant aspects can be briefly mentioned, if they are verifiable by such sources. GermanJoe (talk) 12:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
This entry is no longer correct on the licensing...
it should be updated — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.92.40.179 (talk) 09:34, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Change it to what? Their Github says AGPL. – Thjarkur(talk) 16:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
