Talk:Universal City, California

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Los Angeles city[edit]

If 70% is in the City, then???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.45.168.113 (talk) 21:23, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

Nomenclature ? Changes ? Who Decides ?[edit]

Universal City, California, Los Angeles OR Universal City, California

A precedet setting decision for one of the world's largest city's deserves wider discussion and input.

There is a definite lack of advance 'discussion width', which left me unaware of changes (considered or already done such as here) even though very active with L.A. Districts' articles. Personally I do not find using the word 'notorious' and L.A. used together by some 'change advocates' in other discussions positive or a npov backup. I'm neutral on the decision itself, but not on the process to date though.

More transparency before further changes, with notification and 'auto-forwarding' of 'old 3 names' titles (in both article links and new searches) could avoid difficult startles. The Reseda, Los Angeles, California (OR Reseda, Los Angeles ?? eg: the 'crap shoot' problem for now...) has discussion on talk page of neighborhood vs. district vs. census-designated place (CDP). If the change is inevitable perhaps doing so in district name alphabetical order would take out random 'crap shoot' searching now (or explaining another system being used).

Please stop further districts' changes until this is resolved so we all know how to find an article. Thank you-Look2See1 t a l k → 22:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because most of Universal City is in unincorporated territory, this article has historically been written as if it was a full unincorporated area. Therefore, it uses the standard [[Placename, State]] naming convention as per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#United States, and thus was not affected by the discussion at Talk:Los_Angeles#Various_move_requests_involving_LA_Neighborhoods. Zzyzx11 (talk) 08:18, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

copyediting[edit]

I managed to rewrite a segment of the section that was identified as needing changes but then had my attention diverted to the Lead section, as it also in need of changing. I am going to try and come back to this article later. --Soulparadox 03:50, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

NBC relocation section outdated[edit]

The section on NBC's relocation is all about plans for 2011. It's 2013 now, so this should be updated to reflect what has actually been completed or is underway. I've added an "updatesection" tag accordingly. 70.72.211.35 (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Universal City, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Population Source?[edit]

I see there is a population listed on the article, but no relevant source is attached to it. Does anyone know where the data is coming from, because I don't see this place listed in the Census. BhamBoi (talk) 04:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]