Talk:University Grants Commission (India)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

under prosed invercity any work and stodent life protection[edit]


cbi india addmestetive on unvercity -----------

!-minester of ugc !-pm of india !-partner ngo gov of india !-local chermen !-collgee unian presedent !-local polesh !-prinspal

Hi people.
The three edits of Special:Contributions/Avinashbandal are unambiguous copyright violations, copied straight from University Grants Commission's website.
The website is "Copyright © 2013 University Grants Commission New Delhi, India"
The edits were made in February 2014.
I have WP:REVDEL'd the blatant copyright violations by this user, but the article and its history still includes the text.
I'm following Wikipedia:Copyright violations. --Shirt58 (talk) 10:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NON STRICT REGULATIONS .[edit]

Here every state have on rule and regulations to run higher education. But all depends on subject which ever they provide. UGC are regulatory body for find out those mistake. But it seems to be a little bit disappointed. While every state have different subjects for graduation. For example if you are doing B.com economic subjects are one of the most important for this courses but Bangalore university are not providing nor micro or macro. Lots of university gives important to finance subject. But there is no company or government sector who provide directly post for financial work. So, finance became no important. Even thou of we apply for SSC exam there is no option for finance subject. Rather than accountancy,taxation,economic etc. UGC Should guide all the university for the future of Indian student. No matter north,south, east, or northeast India the syllabus should be same it will make sense of Indian education. Malhotra Sony (talk) 17:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UGC approved 38653 journals list on fire Amitreenujain (talk) 14:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UGC is against Hindi research papers in promotion s Amitreenujain (talk) 14:28, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

97%journals in UGC approved list are not Indian Amitreenujain (talk) 14:28, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UGC must approved Indian journals sending by universities and should use NISCAIR source Amitreenujain (talk) 14:30, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Amitreenujain: some reference sources for your claims would be interesting. Batternut (talk) 19:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on University Grants Commission (India). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on University Grants Commission (India). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

contempt of court by UGC[edit]

This is a big matter of contempt of honourable Delhi high court order by UGC.The order was passed on 23/05/2018 regarding wp 5570 by Dr Amit Jain to restore his 10 journals with in two weeks.But UGC did not obey till now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitreenujain (talkcontribs) 13:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Amitreenujain: And your point is ? If you have a suggestion, make it. Talk pages are not forums. --Muhandes (talk) 17:37, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]