Talk:Uniworld

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Travel and Tourism High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transport: Maritime Low‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Cleanup tags[edit]

The article is not written with a neutral point of view, and reads as an advertisement (as of 26-Oct-2008) as well as being laced with weasel words. These issues need to be fixed before removing the cleanup tags.

--- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:10, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is still an ad, nine years later. In addition, I was linked to this page while looking for the historically significant Uniworld advertising agency, that has worked to promote black films to white and mixed audiences since the early seventies. Personally I don't see any reason not to delete the article as it stands now in March 2017.

2620:104:E001:A011:A0D7:B302:79BE:F853 (talk) 04:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]