Talk:Unparticle physics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Experiments?[edit]

The sentence "LHC will begin probing a higher energy frontier in 2009" is clearly outdated. Is there any experimental progress in the field ever since? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.125.153.167 (talk) 01:29, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not fringe[edit]

Please do not delete unmatter. It is not fringe science. It was published in The Telegraph, presented at CalTech in 2010, cited in the AMS conference, included in Neil Sloane's Encyclopedia of Integers, in Hadronic Journal, and cited in SLAC SPIRES and INSPIRE sites, etc.:

1) Roger Highfield, Is our cosmos teeming with alien 'unmatter'?, The Telegraph, 23 Jan 2008, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/large-hadron-collider/3322840/Is-our-cosmos-teeming-with-alien-unmatter.html

2) Introduction to Neutrosophic Physics: Unmatter & Unparticle conference, American Mathematical Society meetings, December 2—4, 2011, http://www.ams.org/meetings/calendar/2011_dec2-4_gallup.html

3) Ervin Goldfain and Florentin Smarandache, Connection between `unparticle’ and `unmatter', 2010 Annual Meeting of the California-Nevada Section of the American Physical Society, California Institute of Technology, Building 47, Downs Laboratory of Physics, Classroom 107 (room), Pasadena, CA, USA, Session H3 (Multidisciplinary Research), 01:00 PM, Saturday, 30 October 2010; Bulletin of the American Physical Society, APS April Meeting 2011, Volume 56, Number 5, April 30–May 3 2011; Anaheim, California, USA, http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/APR11/Event/145867

4) Neil Sloane's Encyclopedia of Integers, Unmatter combinations as pairs of quarks (q) and antiquarks (a), for q >= 1 and a >= 1, Sequence A181633, in Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, by N.J.A. Sloane, http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A181633 Neil Sloane's Encyclopedia of Integers, Unmatter combinations of quarks and antiquarks of length n>=1 that preserve the colorless, Sequence A181635, in Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, by N.J.A. Sloane, http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A181635

5-6) Similarly the sequences A181634, A181685 in EIS are about unmatter.

7) F. Smarandache, Verifying unmatter by experiments, more types of unmatter, and a quantum chromodynamics formula, SLAC SPIRES, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=dk+%22UNMATTER%22 F. Smarandache, A New Form of Matter Unmatter, Composed of Particles and Anti-Particles, http://inspirebeta.net/record/707616?ln=en

8) Ervin Goldfain, Florentin Smarandache, On Emergent 'Unparticles' and Exotic 'Unmatter' States, Hadronic J. 31 (2008) 591-604, INSPIRE http://inspirebeta.net/record/874524?ln=en — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.155.235 (talk) 17:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indepedently of whether it is fringe science or not, any mention of Smarandache's work should be based on an independent third-party source. However, all these papers you mention are his own. The Telegraph article you link to is not concerned with Smarandache's work. Finally, AFAIK anyone can submit anything to the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, so that doesn't count either. - Saibod (talk) 20:37, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
One need look no farther than http://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+unparticle/0/1/0/all/0/1 to see that this is indeed a valid field of study, with interesting things to say. Agree with non-fringe, but an expert does need to work on the article to improve it. - Flying hazard (talk) 18:24, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The papers you link to are about the subject matter of the article. What we are discussing here is Smarandache's "theory" of unmatter, which is probably not discussed in any of these serious research papers. - Saibod (talk) 10:49, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship[edit]

It looks like censorship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.226.130 (talk) 21:57, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Real examples of unmatter[edit]

The pionium, positronium and protonium are unmatter because the pionium is formed by a π+ and π- mesons, the positronium is formed by an antielectron (positron) and an electron in a semi-stable arrangement, the protonium is formed by a proton and an antiproton also semi-stable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.8.210.24 (talk) 03:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

gravity[edit]

does this tackle the problem of gravity ? or like the standard model fails to explain it. if it does explain it then how? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.248.232 (talk) 17:56, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unparticle-mediated superconductivity[edit]

http://phys.org/news/2015-04-unparticles-path-superconductivity.html 85.178.211.215 (talk) 19:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]