Talk:Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument

	Montana portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Memorials / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military memorials and cemeteries task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

IUCN Category[edit]

The infobox lists this as category IV, and I could not find this National Monument listed in the ICUN database (probably because it is new). Where did you find the category? Unless you have a reference that lists it as IV, I would be tempted to show it as III (Natural Monument) as a quick check of other National Monuments listed in the IUCN database showed most came up in that category. There were a couple of exceptions (such as Scotts Bluff National Monument - V) though.

When I make a guess at the IUCN category, I add a version of this line of text just after the infobox:

 Eoghanacht ^talk 17:22, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that info...I pretty much guessed (!) and I don't like doing that..I think National Mounments more related to history than biology are most likely iucn cat. V...the emphasis of the breaks region is going to be biology.--MONGO 03:26, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification: From our statements, it seems like this should be III: Natural Monument, but you put V: Protected Landscape on the page. Did I miss something? My sample code was just that -- a sample -- rather than a recommendation for this particular page. I am going to mod the page. Change it and let me know if you disagree.  Eoghanacht ^talk 18:48, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be some ambiguity between III and V and overlap...either one probably works and I'm not beholden one way or the other, although I prefer precision if possible...I'll have to reexamine the IUCN categories, but level III works fine for me.--MONGO 01:54, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Name?[edit]

Am I missing some discussion about the name somewhere else? "Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument" appears to be both the formal name[1][2], and the 'most common' name[3], and yet the current title is "Upper Missouri River National Monument". But I don't want to just up and move it if this has been hashed out before somewhere. Fixbeforeigo 05:36, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Going to do a move now.--MONGO 12:19, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External Links[edit]

As of today (June 2009), all the external links go to 404 pages. --71.168.124.11 (talk) 04:55, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Mongo, the official name is the Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.127.126.32 (talk) 18:52, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not NRHP-listed[edit]

Removing NRHP template from article, and removing from NRHP wikiproject here. It appears this NM is not NRHP-listed (like many other NMs). doncram (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050217045711/http://www.doi.gov:80/news/archives/Missour.html to http://www.doi.gov/news/archives/Missour.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]