Talk:Urokinase

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Urokinase.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Untitled[edit]

I moved the receptor to its own page

Not this absurd 'first' again![edit]

Why do authors insist on writing this drivel? It was not 'first' discovered in 1947, it was discovered in 1947. It was discovered ONCE ONLY, not a first time and a second time (or whatever). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 15:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, the "first" has been deleted now. EMsmile (talk) 14:26, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit links not placed correctly[edit]

I know this is a minor issue, but I noticed the edit boxes are appearing in the wrong place on this page - could it be something to do with the infoboxes' code? I note the first two boxes appear after the first infobox, at least for my browser (Firefox 2.0.0.17) and resolution (1440x900) --Rogerb67 (talk) 14:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sources[edit]

Are there any sources for section 3 about the relationship with cancer? 89.31.50.92 (talk) 20:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Result: No merge. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be the same as PLAU (plasminogen activator, urokinase). I'm not sure how to merge this without messing up all the infoboxes. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 10:26, 31 January 2010 (UTC) I agree with this merge proposal, but am also unsure of the best way in which to do this without messing it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nexxen (talk • contribs) 04:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, it would be wrong to merge these articles, Urokinase and PLAU. This article outlines a class of enzymes (EC 3.4.21.73), while the article PLAU has a focus on a specific human gene product, PLAU, from that class. --Dcirovic (talk) 20:39, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Eureka?[edit]

So when was it discovered? TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 13:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Link to gene[edit]

I agree that the two pages should be merged, but if not at least a link to PLAU is in order. Gon-no-suke (talk) 05:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Industrial production[edit]

Could someone please add information how it is nowadays produced industrially? It says that it was produced from urine - is this still the main way of producing this? If so, who collects the urine and where?