This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular Culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular CultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular CulturePopular Culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Jennifer Gardiner (26 November 2020). "Google earth images suggest utah monolith has been there for several-years". abc4 News. Retrieved 28 November 2020. According to a newly created Wikipedia Page dedicated to the Utah monolith, public officials announced the discovery but withheld its location to prevent people from getting lost while trying to find it.
Over at List of works similar to the 2020 Utah monolith it was pointed out that there are other monoliths in Utah, many holding the common name for a long time. With the cooling of time, does it make sense to add a year to the title here? – SJ + 00:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Probably not. The 2020 version received worldwide media coverage and Utah monolith is the WP:COMMONNAME, eg [1].--♦IanMacM♦(talk to me) 06:52, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Call it Utah monolith (2020). When adding year disambiguates we don't go by common name. Personally I think it should be Utah metal monolith which is more descriptive, and disambiguates at the same time, all other monoliths are natural. WP:COMMONNAME says Editors should also consider all five of the criteria for article titles outlined above. Ambiguous or inaccurate names for the article subject, as determined in reliable sources, are often avoided even though they may be more frequently used by reliable sources.. This is precisly the case here. Most of those sources were contemporary to the event, when everyone knew what it meant, but Wikipedia is writing for a 100 year audience, they don't have the context of knowing what "Utah monolith" means. It fails the WP:CRITERIA list of name ("Precision"), it's ambiguous, and by extension fails COMMONNAME per the green quote. -- GreenC 19:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
was not magnetic, and appeared to be made of 1/8th inch stainless steel or aluminum sheets
Is there such a thing as non-magnetic steel? —Tamfang (talk) 06:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I searched "non-magnetic steel" in Google and got some results like "Some stainless steels are magnetic, and others are not. The defining factor of magnetism comes down to the the steel's microstructure" and "Most stainless steels falling under this category are non-magnetic because they contain high amounts of austenite." (CC)Tbhotch™ 06:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stainless steel is often non-magnetic. I can confirm this because some of my stainless steel saucepans will not work on an induction hob. If a magnet won't stick to it, it won't work on an induction hob. Steel is an alloy and it isn't always magnetic.[2]--♦IanMacM♦(talk to me) 08:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}