Talk:Uyarndha Manithan/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 06:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Lede
  • "The film's soundtrack and background score were composed by M. S. Viswanathan, while the lyrics for the film's" -you can remove both instances of "film's"
 Done as asked. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • "with the release prints being 4,591 m (15,062 ft) long" -no need to mention in lede.
 Done I followed the ledes of other GAs I had done but I have nevertheless removed it as per your suggestion. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It would be OK ro mention it in discussing production, but I think it looks a bit awkward to say it on release.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr. Blofeld: I have written it in the production section. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What I meant was if there was a bit mentioning the production of the film in the lede you could mention it within that, but as there isn't don't worry.
Plot
  • "to retain any job that he gets selected" -awkward, try just "to retain a job".
 Done written as "to retain any job". Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • "teir love"
 Done as asked. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Raju throws Sathyamurthy out of Raju's house despite Sathyamurthy proclaiming his innocence. "- add comma after house.
 Done as asked. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Production
  • "a deicision" -typo :-)
 Done as asked. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:26, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I took care of the rest.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Good job.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just added it to the GA film list after Thunderbirds Are Go LOL. who'd have thought!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:05, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Haha. Thank you once again for conducting the review. It was very swift and smooth as well. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 08:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, you caught me at the right time on this, first thing in the morning, and in some of the past reviews I had a ton of FA reviews and peer reviews to do or was just really busy, hence the delay. Keep up the good work, let me know when you want another reviewed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr. Blofeld: Most definitely, Dr. Blofeld. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 08:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]