Talk:Uzbekistan at the 2014 Winter Paralympics

Uzbekistan at the 2014 Winter Paralympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 10, 2018. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Uzbekistan at the 2014 Winter Paralympics appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 May 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Brazil, Turkey, and Uzbekistan all made their Winter Paralympics debuts at the 2014 Sochi Games?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Turkey at the 2014 Winter Paralympics.

Wikipedia

Central Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal Uzbekistan at the 2014 Winter Paralympics is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics: Paralympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Paralympics task force. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Uzbekistan at the 2014 Winter Paralympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 18:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Rephrase this sentence: " Yevgeniy Slepov completed all three runs, he posted his two best times on runs 1 and 3.". Rewritten.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Expand the intro to include results Done
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Can you try to figure out why Ramil Gayazov was DQ'ed? One translated source made it seem like he didn't make it to the end of the run. Try looking through whatever local Google Uzbekistan uses.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Flag is properly tagged
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	No images found on Commons for this
	7. Overall assessment.

Include this as an external link?

Added. Found the disqualification reason, he missed gate 43. I knew that was what it had to be, but never had been able to find it... All other responses inline. Kees08 ping!

Kees08 reping! This time with a signature to make it work, even! Courcelles (talk) 18:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]