Talk:VEX prefix

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the VEX prefix article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Problems[edit]

This article sits at an uneasy crossroad with the title being "VEX prefix" but having "REX prefix" redirect to it.

Ideally, there would be a decision whether it's more desirable to have

an all-encompassing "x86 instruction encoding"/"x86 instruction extensions"/"x86 instruction prefixes" article that also subsumes the separate "EVEX prefix" article, or
multiple articles for each individual x86 prefix, such that "REX prefix" would be split from the "VEX prefix" article (though I have no idea what to do with REX2 ...)

--Soc88 (talk) 23:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should mention that this only works in 64 bit mode, which is why they can get away with replacing the les and the lds instructions:

Introduction to Intel Advanced Vector extensions^[1]

209.23.223.4 (talk) 18:11, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References