Talk:Value noise

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer graphics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Link text[edit]

Just in case anyone is wondering why I claim that the page is mislabeled, the description of the noise types is in the sourced book, and the noise on the web page matches the description of the Value noise more. SiegeLord (talk) 23:14, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Octaves link is pointing to the wrong place. 83.183.141.239 (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Next time be bold and fix it yourself ;). SiegeLord (talk) 22:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

Is there any info on who invented this? Did it come before or after Perlin's gradient noise? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.35.102.176 (talk) 08:12, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't be surprised if this technique arose from multiple sources, since practically speaking it's faster and less analytically complicated. It's the "naive" approach to noise as far as I'm aware. I suppose someone could scour the internet and publications for the earliest documented instance... this paper references "value noise" without any citation (https://www.cs.utah.edu/~aek/research/hwnoise.pdf) and then reference's Lewis's sparse convolution noise as an example, which itself doesn't appear to reference anything (https://ai2-s2-pdfs.s3.amazonaws.com/37d4/295a6fe32b5d89217b8fbc023d8185b0cf50.pdf). Honestly value noise seems obvious (interpolating by some method between regularly spaced, sampled noise values doesn't seem like an invention), but maybe it only seems so in retrospect. 68.63.108.194 (talk) 18:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Value noise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080724063449/http://freespace.virgin.net/hugo.elias/models/m_perlin.htm to http://freespace.virgin.net/hugo.elias/models/m_perlin.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Verified the link. Made some changes to the title of the link using the original title of the article cited, while retaining that explanation surrounding the confusion of the two terms - DutchTreat (talk) 13:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]