Talk:Vanuatu at the 2008 Summer Olympics

Vanuatu at the 2008 Summer Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 25, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Melanesia: Vanuatu Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Melanesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Melanesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MelanesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MelanesiaTemplate:WikiProject MelanesiaMelanesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vanuatu (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Vanuatu at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:49, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I will begin reviewing this article as soon as possible!--Dom497 (talk) 00:49, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
The quality of the article is good.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
~~Please see below.~~ Issues fixed.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Everything looks good for this section of the review.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
All statements have at least one reference.

C. No original research:
No original research found.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
The article covers all major aspects of the topic.

B. Focused:
The article stays on topic.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
No bias found.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Article is stable.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
All images used in the article are tagged properly.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Images are used where possible.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

Everything in the article is great. I just have 2 suggestions that should be taken into consideration before I pass the article.

Under the athletic section of the article, above the table it says Mens, but there is a women event in the table. This needs to be fixed.
- I removed the titles "Mens", and for consistency's sake, the "Womens" on the next event. It should be all set. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 01:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For reference #2, why isn't it in the "</ref>{{cite web|url=..." form? This should be fixed before I pass the article.
- I formatted it without the Cite web format because when I set it up, the result (for some reason) refused to connect to the actual URL. Once I placed the actual reference in Cite web format. it ended up looking something like "[www.sportingpulse.com/get_file.cgi?id=591528 "2008 VASANOC Annual Report"]. Vanuatu Association of Sports and National Olympic Committee. 2008. Retrieved 26 April 2012." I could add in the retrieval date, however, which I seemed to have forgotten. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 01:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--Dom497 (talk) 19:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for doing this review. I have addressed the first comment. Hopefully my answer to the second is sufficient, but let me know if there are alternate solutions to be had. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 01:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weird...I tried fixing the problem using different formats for the reference on my sandbox but nothing worked...--Dom497 (talk) 18:43, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vanuatu at the 2008 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120815012958/http://ittf.com/World_Events/Olympic_games_2008/Olympics_08_players_list_Final_28_Jul_2008.pdf to http://www.ittf.com/World_Events/Olympic_games_2008/Olympics_08_players_list_Final_28_Jul_2008.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]