Talk:Vasavadatta

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled[edit]

Liar is the pathetic 50-year-old loser who says "replaced references" in the edit summary for making this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Subandhu&action=historysubmit&diff=3637465 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.168.133 (talk) 19:21, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shunyabindu dating[edit]

Subandhu's Vasavadatta is famous among mathematical circles because it is the first known source that uses "sunyabindu" for the dot used as a zero in ancient times. Almost all the math. references I have seen date it to about 625 AD. However, Maan Singh's analysis dates it to a couple of centuries earlier. This dating turns out to be quite important in the evolution of the zero concept. So, any more information on the date would be quite useful. Thanks. - Kautilya3 (talk) 01:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]