Talk:Verneuil method

A fact from Verneuil method appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 February 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Verneuil process, used in ruby synthesis, is considered as the founding step for modern industrial crystal growth technology?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/February.

Wikipedia

Gemology and Jewelry: Gemology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Gemology subpage.

Cardinal gems[edit]

The cardinal gem link goes to a dab page and there is no link there to an explanation of what cardinal gems are. Can this be explained in the Verneuil article or its own article by someone who knows about this topic? Rlevse 18:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of Creative Commons license![edit]

Check out http://www.mtixtl.com/xtlflyers/Verneuil.doc

Text and pictures are literal copypasta from WikiPedia. They forgot to remove an "[edit]" near the end before the references section. They fail to repeat the Creative Commons license as WikiPedia does at the bottom of every page. Somebody should point it out to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.134.167.245 (talk) 18:30, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Verneuil process. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.rochesterlapidary.org/RockCollector/2005/May-2005.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Verneuil method/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

*Needs upgrading of ref's to inline citations, due to number of ref's and the length of the article. SauliH 03:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 03:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Verneuil process. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927000005/http://www.accessscience.com/server-java/Arknoid/science/AS/Encyclopedia/2/28/Est_284100_pg2.html to http://www.accessscience.com/server-java/Arknoid/science/AS/Encyclopedia/2/28/Est_284100_pg2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]