Talk:Vestas V164

Update[edit]

Please update this page as per the status V164 --202.59.74.212 (talk) 12:33, 12 July 2015 (UTC)nimrainayat6290--202.59.74.212 (talk) 12:33, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about a prototype, not yet a product. It contains little information, all from primary source. Borders on advertising. I suggest merging it into Vestas. TGCP (talk) 16:08, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The bit about Dong's purchase of the V164 is interesting because it's the first commercial installation of the V164 turbine. But I don't believe it being an unusual purchase for Dong tells us anything about the turbine, so I don't believe it's relevant to this article without further information. If it is because of the technical superiority of the turbine and we have a source saying that then it makes sense to me to include it. Otherwise the decision simply doesn't tell us anything about the V164--the topic of this article.

Given the above I'd like to remove that sentence--I simply don't think it adds anything. It feels more like Vestas advertising to me. Possums (talk) 12:43, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the Samsung unit installed at Fife Energy Park in Scotland in 2013 has the world's largest rotor diameter (171.2m) and worlds largest swept area (22,998m2). See article Methil Offshore Wind Farm.

Davagh (talk) 10:27, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vestas V164. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]