Talk:Video buffering verifier

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Recent change explanation[edit]

- This article should be renamed, the official name of the VBV is "video buffer verifier" not "video buffering verifier" (regarding to the ISO 13818-1 standart) Ma.fricke (talk) 12:41, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although ISO/IEC 13818-1 : 2000 does use "video buffer verifier", it only does so once, and refers the reader to ISO/IEC 13818-2. In ISO/IEC 13818-2 : 1995, the document consistently calls it "video buffering verifier", in section titles and the glossary of terms, and never calls it "video buffer verifier". Therefore I believe it's an error made in the 13818-1 document.

BTW, ISO/IEC 13818-1 and -2 are both MPEG-2 specs; in the MPEG-1 spec it's also referred to as "video buffering verifier". C xong (talk) 04:58, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- According to ISO/IEC 13818-2 Annex C, vbv buffer shall not overflow nor underflow except the case of low_delay. This requirement is true for both VBR and CBR.

- Since VBV is defined only in terms of video elementary stream, it's nothing to do with multiplexing. Multiplexers, however, have to follow the requirements of T-STD / P-STD, though. Motonari 23:02, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]