Talk:Vidya Bharati

Shishu Shiksha Samiti, Assam was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 17 July 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Vidya Bharati. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vidya Bharati article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

India: Education Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Education in India workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyvio?[edit]

JamesBWatson, The current version is virtually the same as what I wrote years ago [1]. I am curious what copyvio's you have found. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:52, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't really checked the whole article yet, it seems the section on Cultural education seems to have borrowed a lot from Fundamentalisms and Society: Reclaiming the Sciences, the Family, and Education. D4iNa4 (talk) 17:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually every quote that I copied and pasted into Google turned up in other web pages. Some of them were clearly copied from Wikipedia, and others may have been, but many of them did not appear to be. A few examples of pages which contain some of the same text as the Wikipedia article and don't look as though they are copied from it are rksvn.com/mission-vision/, ssvnmulayankavu.com/Profile.html, ssmbhowali.in, rksvn.com/core-philosophy, ssvnmulayankavu.com/Profile.html. However, quite apart from the copyright question, the article was very heavily biased towards presenting the organisation's own view of itself. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are two paragraphs in the Ideology and Objectives section which are of this kind. Somebody did a COPYVIO check before I got involved. So I trusted that they did their job. Those paragrahs give me goose pimples anyway. I am happy to get rid of them.

But the rest is all sourced to scholarly sources. I am sure the other sites copied our text, e.g., http://rksvn.com/mission-vision/. These school teachers treat Wikipedia as a textbook and think it is meant to be copied. :-) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 00:25, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you are right. It is very difficult to tell for sure in situations where content which has been in a Wikipedia article for years is also found elsewhere. If you wish to restore content which you are confident does not infringe copyright I won't quarrel about it. However, it would be better to be selective, and not restore promotional content. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:36, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sanskriti gyan paper 2020[edit]

2020 paper class 7 sanskriti gyan 2409:4052:E07:87A4:0:0:ACC8:1F08 (talk) 04:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]