Talk:Vietnam Railways

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	2008-05-19

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

Vietnam Top‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Using local names[edit]

If Ha Noi and Sai Gon, rather than Hanoi and Ho Chi Min City, are used this conforms to local practice: The language only contains words of one syllable. Sai Gon is still used for the city (and railway station), whereas Ho Chi Min City is the name of the administrative region. Just follow the link to the VNR timetables for example Old Moonraker 09:38, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We should use the official and most common name for the cities which in English are Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City. The most common name for the country is Vietnam. See Talk:Vietnam.

I followed your suggestion and looked at the Talk:Vietnam page. They're are still arguing, but Viet Nam seems to be winning. Anyhow, this is a railway page, so let's not argue here. Old Moonraker 08:21, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External link[edit]

A link has been posted to the commercial website Vietnam Travel Services This has some useful information and is a marginal "keep". Please note, however, that it has copied its account of the railway from this article, and not the other way round. There is no copyright violation. --Old Moonraker (talk) 12:13, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've forwarded the boilerplate response from Wikipedia:Standard GFDL violation letter, more to emphasise our right to the material than in the hope of any acknowledgement on their page. --Old Moonraker (talk) 12:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for my earlier doubts: an acknowledgement and reference to the GNU license has been added: thanks! --Old Moonraker (talk) 17:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite needed[edit]

As per the recent peer review for Rail transport in Vietnam (which contains information merged from this article), this article should be expanded/rewritten to include more information about the company's history, organization, holdings, equipment, services, and so on. I've got a draft version in my sandbox, if you'd like. --dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 14:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Vietnam Railways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080204121003/http://www.thanhniennews.com:80/travel/?catid=7&newsid=26957 to http://www.thanhniennews.com/travel/?catid=7&newsid=26957

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:19, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

>>Locomotive number[edit]

This image is used in both this article and the Da Lat–Thap Cham Railway article, yet each time giving a different number for the locomotive. I have removed both until it can be ascertained beyond doubt which – if either – number is correct. Whichever it turns out to be, the number should go before the word "locomotive" in the caption, as I believe it is a model number, not a serial or registration number. Kelisi (talk) 21:04, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]