Talk:vile (text editor)

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software.

Software: Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Comment on lede[edit]

"purportedly" doesn't seem to convey the proper sense, since it leaves the possibility that the claim is not well-founded Tedickey (talk) 16:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the original conveyed an intent; the altered version seems to imply the opposite, though implying this either way is not the purpose of the sentence. From a reader's standpoint, it certainly seems to convey a non-neutral point of view. The edit to the majormodes section also seems to be in error, as the section header was in reference to the functionality, and not some other group of modes. However, the Emacs article has all uses written as 'major modes', so this may be acceptable if all instances are thus named. 142.177.178.197 (talk) 03:02, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on Learning to use vile[edit]

Actually none of the vi-clones provide the original vi documentation, but they provide some documentation with similar scope. Tedickey (talk) 16:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with Linux-Gazette links[edit]

LG's not working at the moment, though google's cache is recent. Here is an alternate location, in case LG has persistent problems Tedickey (talk) 09:56, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vile (editor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]