Talk:Villa I Tatti

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments[edit]

Dear Editors, When I posted all this article (cutting and pasting from my Word file) all my footnotes fell out. Do I need to reinsert these manually, and is there a guide to doing this? Is it the "ref/ref" button in the toolbar above? (Excuse my ignorance.) Thanks!!

Former Villa I Tatti Appointees[edit]

The section does not introduce or explain what an "appointee" is. If there are former appointees, are there current ones as well and why aren't they mentioned? What is the selection criteria for being mentioned? What source or sources are used?

CapnZapp (talk) 20:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The rest of the article does (it may not be the best word though). I'll change it. It's a long-term appointment & no doubt some are current. Having an article, & someone bothering to add it here. There will be sources at most articles - perhaps I Tatti has a list online. Johnbod (talk) 21:34, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I still don't see "appointees" explained or even mentioned anywhere else in the article? Are you referring to "Each year fifteen full-year fellows are chosen from about 110-120 applicants." Can't we just say "fellows applicants" instead of "appointees"? CapnZapp (talk) 13:23, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up, dude - we don't say "appointees" any more. Johnbod (talk) 15:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. Are you saying the word is a slur? Because I just checked and it says "Notable appointees include". What do you mean, and why are you a bit antagonistic (with the tag snark and calling me "dude"). Please dial that down, thanks. If there is anything you dislike about my conduct please tell it to me straight instead of these guessing games. Regards, CapnZapp (talk) 07:42, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly get you don't understand, even after being told. I meant I changed the header, as I said I would above. What is "tag snark"? What is unclear about: "Villa I Tatti fellows / An incomplete list of those with articles:[20] Notable appointees include ...."? Johnbod (talk) 14:11, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]