Talk:Violet Baudelaire

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 December 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Novels: Lemony Snicket Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by Lemony Snicket task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Picture[edit]

Should we use the book illustration picture for the main picture or the movie one? I can understand using the book picture but we don't do that for the Harry Potter Characters pages so why should we do it for this one? Cho Chang 02:17, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Book Illustration. The Violet in the movie is sort of seperate from the original, there should be a picture of Emily Browning as Violet in the section about the movie though.

The End Update[edit]

Shouldn't someone update what happens to Violet during The End? I would do it myself, but I haven't read the book yet. Clamster5 13:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

welding[edit]

hey i was just wondering if violet wore a welding mask when using the torches, most likely

If you are refering to the episode in The Ersatz Elevator, no, she did not.

Then how did she protect her eyes from the flames?

There were no flames, jackass —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.55.102.17 (talk) 01:58, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Violetbaudelairebed.jpg[edit]

Image:Violetbaudelairebed.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. ONE DAY I FELL IN LOVE WITH SOME ONE!!

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Violet's and Quigley's relationship[edit]

I was reading Violet's biography, and I was up to the point where it talks about how Violet grows close with Quigley. I was starting to smile because I always thought their relationship was really cute, but THEN... "it is implied at one point that they may have had sex" No! This is a kid's book, I always thought they shared a kiss in the scene. Somebody side with me so I know I'm right to change it so that I can. Othatzsokewl (talk) 21:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it does not say anything about what they did. A kiss makes the most sense, but no specific action is ever heavily implied. Certainly they weren't having sex while sitting on the ledge of a frozen waterfall. The Quagmire page has already been repeatedly subjected to similar inane speculation. Sorry I didn't catch this one. — The Man in Question (gesprec) · (forðung) 02:19, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Death[edit]

Why do we assume she may have died if it's stated in the Beatrice Letters that she didn't? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.2.33 (talk) 12:21, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]