Talk:Violin Sonata No. 1 (Stanford)

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

A fact from Violin Sonata No. 1 (Stanford) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 April 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Charles Villiers Stanford's Violin Sonata No. 1 was first performed in Cambridge, by violinist Ludwig Straus and the composer at the piano?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Violin Sonata No. 1 (Stanford).

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Violin Sonata No. 1 by Charles Villiers Stanford was first performed in Cambridge by violinist Ludwig Straus ~~and~~with the composer at the piano? Source: [1] p. 5

Reviewed: Lin Wenzheng

Created by Graham1973 (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 20:14, 28 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]

New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook is interesting; hook ref verified and cited inline. I tweaked the hook wording. Image in article is freely licensed. QPQ done. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]