Talk:Virgin Atlantic Little Red

Virgin Atlantic Little Red has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 14, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Virgin Atlantic Little Red appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 April 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a British giant swallowed a little red virgin?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Virgin Atlantic Little Red.

Wikipedia

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Defunct airlines

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This article is supported by the Defunct Airlines task force.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Sussex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Virgin Atlantic Little Red/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: White Arabian Filly (talk · contribs) I have 4 GAs now, so I propose to begin reviewing in order to help with the backlog. White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 22:34, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria[edit]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Yes; article is written in British English, but it's about a British subject so that is entirely appropriate.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Yes. I do not see any problem words like "currently".
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	All content is sourced.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	All sources appear reliable.
	2c. it contains no original research.	No OR detected.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No copyvio or close paraphrasing detected.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Yes, goes into depth on multiple aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Yes; gives good coverage of the topic.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Article is neutral.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No recent edit wars or POV pushing.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Images are correctly licensed for use in the article.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	The photo and logo are appropriate and so are the captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Article meets all criteria. Congrats!

Comments[edit]

Overall, a well-written article. I have only these concerns:

In the table, wouldn't it be easier to use citations at the end of each line than putting them below the whole table?
- The citations support all content of the table. SST flyer 00:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think the lead could use a bit more detail about the operation of the airline.
- This article is quite short (5535 characters), so I think the length of the lead section is adequate. SST flyer 00:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 22:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks for being so quick to reply. White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 15:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]