Talk:VirusBuster

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

I remember using the Australian version of Virus Buster in the early 1990's (I think it was from Leprechaun at that stage). The business was run out of Queensland, but support moved to Wollongong (I think the Uni of Wollongong) in the early 2000's, which is around the time the product moved to Zondex. One of the key reasons for the change of support was the health of the business owner in Queensland. All of this is from memory, and I don't have any specific evidence. However, I installed Vb at work and also used it at home (all paid and legal, I was that impressed at the time). Vb introduced heuristic scanning - the first versions apended checksums to files as part of the mechanisms. Vb was also the first to introduce a native widows (Windows 3.0) interface - the other companies were merely using a DOS window - and *I think* they were doing some windows-specific checks. 59.167.237.41 (talk) 22:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC) Alan D. Anyway, later the company seemingly had failed to catch up with the rivals. Now the technology will live in the Agnitum line of products. --213.181.193.240 (talk) 18:33, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]