This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
Cambodia - removal of information on electronic visa application
Chile - even though a visa-free agreement was signed it is yet to be ratified. In the article it was changed to "Visa not required"
Cuba - all articles in the Visa requirements for xxx citizens list it as red and Tourist card required because it must be obtained in advance. In fact the full name of the document is "Visa - Toruist card". In the article it was changed to "Visa not required".
Sri Lanka - even though the visa on arrival scheme works through the Electronic Travel Authorization it was changed to Visa on arrival. This is contrary to other articles in the Visa requirements for xxx citizens.
Sri Lanka - in the notes section the information was added on Electronic Travel Authorization but was changed to Guyanese spelling. The Sri Lankan Government named this system "Electronic Travel Authorization" so it should be spelled that way because it is a proprietary name. American, Electronic System for Travel Authorization is called just that in the British citizens visa requirements article, no one is trying to call it an Electronic System for Travel Authorisation because that is not the name. Just the same, the name here is Electronic Travel Authorization.
The section "Dependent and autonomous territories" was renamed to "Autonomous, Dependent, Disputed, or Restricted Territories" in order to confuse the readers. This is the only conclusion given that the table contains no disputed or restricted territories.
These are the issues that appeared due to the edits by user Eriochrome who started editing Wikipedia yesterday.--Twofortnights (talk) 18:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]