Talk:Voices from the Gathering Storm

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 June 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Environment

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Initial comment[edit]

I own, operate and publish voices.datacorner.com. Any material I post to voices.datacorner.com and www.datacorner.com is in the public domain. There is no copyright notice on anything listed in the datacorner.com domain. If needed, I can place a public domain notice on voices.datacorner.com.

Anything else?

...and I just added the GFDL as a footer to voices.datacorner.com. OK?

The critical sources listed are both published authors providing their objective evaluation of the book. Although these evaluations are complimentary, I would argue that they are not 'advertisement' since they are third party evaluations. Would appreciate any references within Wiki to other book descriptions that I might use for guidance as to Wiki compliance. Datacorner 16:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is it worth keeping this article?[edit]

I do not see the point in having an article on books which are not notable. This book is not notable yet. Alan Liefting 09:34, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is notable?[edit]

Haven't heard of "notable" as a criterion for inclusion into Wikipedia. The category "2005 books" lists 188 entries. Of those which are "notable"? Voices at least has the merit to have been reviewed by other published authors (feel free to check the book website) and to contain contributions by still other published authors -recognized authorities in the environmental domain-, some of whom are already listed in Wikipedia. If we use peer review as the entry barrier, how many of the books listed under "2005 books" meet even that criterion?

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Voices from the Gathering Storm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091021083846/http://www.voicesfromthegatheringstorm.com:80/ to http://www.voicesfromthegatheringstorm.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]