This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
A paid editor made contributions to this article, and has disclosed that fact on this page, therefore the paid contributions template is a matter of fact and does not require discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
According to the policy "if you place the Paid tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article." As a paid editor I'm not allowed to remove the tag myself, but if any volunteer editor thinks that the neutral point of view of the article is ok, they are free to remove the tag as told in the Template:Paid contributions instructions: "If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning."Jjanhone (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alexis Jazz asked someone fluent in Finnish and English to check the traslation "This article contains translated text and the factual accuracy of the translation should be checked by someone fluent in Finnish and English." As a editor of this page, native in Finnish and fluent in English I can confirm it is correct. It may be outdated, but at least it was correct. The Finnish words in the text are company names (or persons' names), all other words have been translated. Ok? Jjanhone (talk) 19:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Notability here is dubious, unless better sources can be found. It might make sense to merge this into the nuclear plant's page. I've placed the PROD tag for now. --- Possibly (talk) 07:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are better sources available in Finnish, see [3] but I'm voting for merging.Jjanhone (talk) 12:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
