Talk:Vortex coronagraph

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vortex coronagraph article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Once this has been resolved, please remove the `\|attention=yes` parameter from this template.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Embarrassment[edit]

This article says absolutely nothing about how vortex (or any other coronagraphs) work. Someone should delete it; it's an embarrassment. Verdana♥Bøld 23:19, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

It's explained in Optical vortex Sisima70 (talk) 18:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Delete! Improve![edit]

The article is not great, but better than nothing. One of the weaknesses is that the references are mostly behind paywalls. An exception is https://www.eso.org/sci/publications/messenger/archive/no.152-jun13/messenger-no152-8-13.pdf so I'll start reading that. PeterGrecian (talk)