This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ricky Martin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ricky Martin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ricky MartinWikipedia:WikiProject Ricky MartinTemplate:WikiProject Ricky MartinRicky Martin articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved per consensus below. (non-admin closure) –Ammarpad (talk) 06:43, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly support per nom. Since we don't do WP:PDABs, should this be a speedy uncontroversial move?Paintspot Infez (talk) 16:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: General WP:PDAB guidelines don't always work; there's Nirvana (band) and Nirvana (British band), and a recent request to move the former to Nirvana (American band) didn't succeed as many cited this. --Kailash29792(talk) 17:11, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Both songs barely have a dozen daily page views [1], quite different from the Nirvana bands where one gets thousands of page views per day and the other less than 2% as many [2]. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 06:06, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Non-free use rationale for the infobox image looks good.
"sixth best ballad" → "sixth-best ballad"
"was best-performing song" – is there a word missing before "best"?
"served as theme song" → "served as the theme song"
Sources are all reliable and archived.
I notice that there are several citations to Newspapers.com that are marked with "|url-access=subscription". Do you have an account? If so, you can make "clippings" that will make the newspaper pages free for others. If you do not, feel free to tell me so I can do it myself (you can also request an account for access at Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library).
.jpg){kind=small}
Done, thank you so much. And yes, I do have an account, I replaced clipped ones. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 23:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
