Talk:Wadley loop

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Regarding Coppertwig's 22-Mar-2008 edit:[edit]

When I rewrote this article, I wanted "discrete" to link to a definition, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary. The disambiguation page does not lead to any definition useful in the context of Wadley Loop receivers, or more generally, any situation where a smoothly-changing input causes the output to go through distinct steps. "Discrete Frequency" is especially bad here; not only is it irrelevant, it's actively misleading. Nobody who follows that link will get anything from it but massive confusion. In the end, I left the word unlinked. If you know how to make it link to a dictionary instead of one of the Wiki articles, fine, but if not, I think the article's better off without a link.