Talk:Wainwright Building

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Coordinate error[edit]

{{geodata-check}} The coordinates need the following fixes:

  • Write here

Wainwright Building 38° 37′ 36″ N, 90° 11′ 31″ W

The historic Wainwright Building is actually located on Chestnut, between 7th and 8th. The coordinates, according to the Maps I displayed, is for the intersection of 7th and Chestnut. To be correct for the building, the coordinates should be adjusted about 50 fifty meter west. Thanks 75.132.31.246 (talk) 20:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Done. BrainMarble (talk) 03:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources pile[edit]

Size before our work 376 dif

Websites[edit]

  • [1] - some background about the architectural significance
  • [2] - not that useful
  • [3] - nothing super useful, although relevant because it proves it's a registered historic place
  • [4] - calls it a "city landmark" as of 1972. That fact should be in the article.
  • [5] - nothing useful
  • [6] - great overview, probably could be mined for more additions to the article (reprinted from the journal Humanities).

News articles[edit]

  • "Phil Cotton - Architect oversaw restoration work at Tower Grove Park, fought to preserve Lafayette Square, Soulard (obituary)". St. Louis Post-Dispatch. June 23, 2009. p. A15. "Cotton opened an office in 1964 at the downtown Wainwright Building and worked to restore what he called "one of the greatest landmarks of American and world architecture." according to his friend, Judge Tom Grady of the St. Louis Circuit Court.

Books[edit]

first skyscraper?[edit]

It says here(Credo) that it was the first true skyscraper...Smallman12q (talk) 12:14, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that recognition typically goes to the Home Insurance Building. - Eureka Lott 16:55, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It was part of the first generation ob skyscrapers but as Eureka Lott said its normally not considered "the first" --Guerillero | My Talk 17:44, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Korom says it wasn't even the first skyscraper by Sullivan. You'd have to come up with a somewhat arbitrary definition of "skyscraper" to make Wainwright the first. Dcoetzee 18:42, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Size[edit]

I'm not sure if we are going for a DYK. If we are We are at only 955 words. For a Full five fold expansion we will need to pull it up to 1880 words. cheers --Guerillero | My Talk 20:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed[edit]

all this:

Along with the Guaranty Building of Buffalo, New York, the Wainwright is among only two surviving Adler & Sullivan skyscrapers.[1][dubious ]
because the existence of the Bayard-Condict Building proves it to be wrong. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 21:29, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Beebe, Michael (June 12, 2007). "New office space urged for two U.S. agencies". The Buffalo News.


Sorry, that is not an Adler-Sullivan building. However it seems to me that the Auditorium Building could fill the bill, since it was the tallest building in Chicago when it opened. Carptrash (talk) 21:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article should state one of only a few, or a number, if we have a reliable source to back one up, Adler and Sullivan skyscrapers. I think it's a stretch to call this one of two because of the Prudential (Guaranty) Building (Buffalo, New York) and the Auditorium Building. Of course, this depends on the definition of skyscraper we use, which is going to be highly subjective regardless. This is why I think it best to compromise on a less precise term, avoid prolonged discussion and go back to soaking in the mastery of Mr. Louis Henri Sullivan. IvoShandor (talk) 04:11, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Wainwright Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]