Jump to content

Talk:Walls of Dubrovnik/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Very good.
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    No, the citation style is incositent; internet references lack author, access date, publisher, etc. Published works lack city of origin &, in some cases, the its issue date.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Yes, all quotes, statistics, and facts likely to be challenged have been cited.
    C. No original research:
    Nil.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Covers the prominent aspects of its existence.
    B. Focused:
    Yes.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Somewhat. In future avoid words that don't impart facts (e.g. "old") if circumstances allow. But, of course I acknowledge that some older sources can't be coherently dated.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    All in order.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Yes, but does there need to be so many?
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Yes.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    When you address the issues I've raised above then the article shall pass! Best of luck. -- Jack1755 (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]