Talk:Walter Krueger/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 03:31, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Having recently reviewed this article for MILHIST A-Class, I will take this one. Peacemaker67 (send, over) 03:31, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
The GA criteria have been checked indirectly during a thorough MILHIST A-Class review here Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Assessment/Walter_Krueger, and have been confirmed to be met by this review.
1. Well written. Yes, excellent prose and compliance with the MOS. 2. Factually accurate and verifiable. Yes, good range of reliable sources. 3. Broad in coverage. Yes, good coverage and keeps detail at an appropriate level. 4. Neutral. Yes. 5. Stable. Yes. 6. Illustrated. Yes. All images were checked during the MILHIST ACR.
Well done. Passed GAN. Peacemaker67 (send, over) 04:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)