Talk:Walter Liedtke

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit deleted[edit]

On February 17th, 2015 I added the following edit to Walter Liedtke’s page: “His appreciation for innovative art extended to works by contemporary artists. For example, Pale Male: a Pilgrimage, an interactive digital painting by Roz Dimon was purchased by Liedtke for the Metropolitan Museum in 2008." The edit was deleted without notice or comment on the Talk page by the “Modernist”, despite the fact that the edit is factual, provable and relevant. If you could provide me with a reason why the edit was deleted or how I could improve it, I would appreciate it. It is crucial that Dr. Liedtke’s interest and support of this contemporary artist is not forgotten. I’ll be happy to provide more references if necessary. Thank you

Kasia Rejzerewicz

Artist’s Rep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kasiarej87 (talkcontribs) 15:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please reference any additions to this article with reliable sources. The artist and work mentioned above is not currently listed as being in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art search the collection, [1] thank you...Modernist (talk) 16:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict with Modernist but I already wrote it and have more detail so save anyway)
Hi Kasiarej87, Modernist's edit summary said "needs verification, and reliable references". You say the statement is "factual, provable and relevant". Modernist was inviting you to do just that: prove it. To start with you could cite some references in this section here on the talk page. (e.g. newspaper articles, academic journals, museum publications. or at least provide a lesser source like museum archives of Liedtke's papers/notes) The relevant policies are:
--Jeremyb (talk) 16:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'd add to the above thoughts that WP:COI may be a concern, especially if the proposed edits are being made by the artist's representative. I'd also advise that even if there were a reliable source to support the edit, this appears to be more important to the artist than to Mr. Liedtke; it really doesn't merit being singled out in his biography as an example of an interest in contemporary art. For that several references from reliable sources, addressing the interest in broader terms, rather than focused on a single artist, would be preferable. Incidentally, a person's notability generally needs to be established in order to merit mention in a Wikipedia article, per WP:NOTABILITY. JNW (talk) 22:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply and suggestions. I'll make sure to provide more resources supporting the edit soon. Best, KR — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kasiarej87 (talkcontribs) 16:22, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

error in birth day[edit]

My husband's birth date is 28 Aug 1945 not the 25th As far as I know, my cousin Roz Dimon's work is the only modern one we own thank you for the post nancy liedtkeNliedtke (talk) 19:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you for these corrections. I am deeply sorry for your loss.--ɱ (talk · vbm) 19:22, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Updated PERSONDATA in footer as well to reflect correct date.
Apologies, in addition to updating his works and publications, I have been meaning to update the references for this entry. I will try to do this over this weekend.
Will address the Dimon work referred to above as well, as part of that.
So very sorry for your loss.... -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 19:49, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looked for verifiable citation re: Dimon work at the Met and was unsuccessful; only found artist-reported information. If there are citations available please post them. -- Erika aka BrillLyle (talk) 20:22, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 20:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Walter Liedtke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]